[robocup-humanoid] ?: One question about the position of Imagesensor.

[Shibatani Naoki]

Dear all,

I agree Mr.Oskar's opinion.

> 2.
> The rule now in question is 4.3.
>
> The wording in the rule draft for 2007 is **exactly** the same
> as in the rules used for 2006 when it was allowed
> to our team to use a camera in the robot's chest as we did
> in RoboCup 2006. It was also allowed to use omnivision camera
> or two cameras (one looking forwad and one looking backward in the
> head) as it was done by other teams in RoboCup 2006.
>
> At this time, it is impossible that there can be any changes in
> the rules for robot design or their interpretation.
> All teams have worked on their robots and submitted
> qualification material.

It is impossible to change the rule (interpretation) for robot design from 
now.
We will have a discussion about the robot design (for future) on the day of 
Robocup 2007.

Our idea about putting the camera in the chest is just,
We don't want to develop the long head ugly robot like Alien.
We have never created the robot that someone deems ugly.
So We don't want again this year.

I attach the image file.
 As you see, we have no other merit,
Insted of putting the camera in the long flattened head,
Putting in the chest part makes the robot  good-looking..

Thank you very much.

Sincerely yours,
 Naoki Shibatani (TeamOSAKA)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Oskar von Stryk" <stryk at sim.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: "Chew Chee Meng" <mpeccm at nus.edu.sg>; "Changjiu Zhou" <zhoucj at sp.edu.sg>
Cc: "Humanoid League Mailing List" <robocup-humanoid at cc.gatech.edu>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [robocup-humanoid] ?: One question about the position of 
Imagesensor.


> Dear Chew Chee, Dear Changjiu, Dear Teams,
>
> 1.
> You are absolutely right. No rule should be based on "twisting of 
> English".
> If there is uncertainty in the formulation it must be clarified.
> This should idealy happen in the time frame which had been set for rule
> discussions.
>
> 2.
> The rule now in question is 4.3.
>
> The wording in the rule draft for 2007 is **exactly** the same
> as in the rules used for 2006 when it was allowed
> to our team to use a camera in the robot's chest as we did
> in RoboCup 2006. It was also allowed to use omnivision camera
> or two cameras (one looking forwad and one looking backward in the
> head) as it was done by other teams in RoboCup 2006.
>
> At this time, it is impossible that there can be any changes in
> the rules for robot design or their interpretation.
> All teams have worked on their robots and submitted
> qualification material.
>
> However, a discussion about future changes in robot design
> (especially for 2008) should be initiated on the mailing list
> before July. Then we will be better prepared for
> future rule discussions and votings on the last day of RoboCup 2007
> (when there is usually only too little time for that).
>
> With best regards,
> Oskar von Stryk
>
> --
> Prof. Dr. Oskar von Stryk           E-Mail: stryk(at)sim.tu-darmstadt.de
> Simulation and Systems Optimization Phone:  ++49 (0) 6151-16-2513
> Technische Universitaet Darmstadt   Fax:    ++49 (0) 6151-16-6648
> Hochschulstr. 10                    http://www.sim.tu-darmstadt.de
> D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
> _______________________________________________
> robocup-humanoid mailing list
> robocup-humanoid at mailman.cc.gatech.edu
> https://mailman.cc.gatech.edu/mailman/listinfo/robocup-humanoid
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: robotwithcamera.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 53632 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cc.gatech.edu/pipermail/robocup-humanoid/attachments/20070203/fa5a6740/attachment-0001.jpe