[mlpack] Discussion about a new Idea

Salman Javaid javaid.salman at gmail.com
Wed Apr 24 12:47:27 EDT 2013


Hello Ryan:
               Currently from what I know of the ml-pack documentation, EM
algorithm has not been implemented. Is there a possibility that we can
discuss implementing it for ml-pack?



Best Regards,
Salman Javaid


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Ryan Curtin <gth671b at mail.gatech.edu>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:50:18AM +0530, ABHISHEK GUPTA wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just want to suggest a new idea to incorporate some Fuzzy based methods
> > to currently implemented algorithms to make them perform better in case
> of
> > noisy or when the data is more inter-linked for example implementing
> Fuzzy
> > C-means or fuzzy naive based classifiers. This would be really helpful
> for
> > image based classification methods.
> > I just want to know whether mlpack needs this or not.
>
> Hello Abhishek,
>
> I am not very familiar with the type of algorithms you are referring to.
> However, that does not mean that they wouldn't be a good project.  The
> only real requirement for mlpack methods is that they are faster
> (preferably orders of magnitude) than competing implementations.
> Generally this is done by implementing state-of-the-art algorithms that
> scale better than standard approaches.
>
> Does this help?  If not, feel free to ask more questions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> --
> Ryan Curtin       | "None of your mailman friends can hear you."
> ryan at igglybob.com |   - Alpha
> _______________________________________________
> mlpack mailing list
> mlpack at cc.gatech.edu
> https://mailman.cc.gatech.edu/mailman/listinfo/mlpack
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.cc.gatech.edu/pipermail/mlpack/attachments/20130424/de753017/attachment.html>


More information about the mlpack mailing list