<p>In <a href="https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/746#discussion_r76306894">src/mlpack/core/tree/cellbound.hpp</a>:</p>
<pre style='color:#555'>&gt; +
&gt; +  /**
&gt; +   * Serialize the bound object.
&gt; +   */
&gt; +  template&lt;typename Archive&gt;
&gt; +  void Serialize(Archive&amp; ar, const unsigned int version);
&gt; +
&gt; + private:
&gt; +  //! The precision of the tree element type.
&gt; +  static constexpr size_t order = sizeof(AddressElemType) * CHAR_BIT;
&gt; +  //! Maximum number of subrectangles.
&gt; +  const size_t maxNumBounds = 10;
&gt; +  //! The dimensionality of the bound.
&gt; +  size_t dim;
&gt; +  //! The bounds for each dimension.
&gt; +  math::RangeType&lt;ElemType&gt;* bounds;
</pre>
<p>It seems like we can't remove this because of the <code>Center()</code> calculation and the <code>Diameter()</code>.  Removing it would mean that for <code>Center()</code> we would have to calculate the mean of all subrectangle centers, and it would be harder to cache something for <code>Diameter()</code>.  My idea in removing it was to make <code>sizeof(CellBound)</code> smaller but it seems that's not really feasible.  But I thought it would be useful to write down the notes anyway in case it was ever revisited later. :)</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/746/files/f17843fc8e8ef2b1c4b04d572c521575f20a1f3c#r76306894">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ4bFMq3lhBggO-tu7EHyE9rzfBwqCkeks5qjeltgaJpZM4JZrEi">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJ4bFNSC0Nga5CO9AluC89UiIvoRdeAXks5qjeltgaJpZM4JZrEi.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/746/files/f17843fc8e8ef2b1c4b04d572c521575f20a1f3c#r76306894"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/mlpack/mlpack","title":"mlpack/mlpack","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@rcurtin in #746: It seems like we can't remove this because of the `Center()` calculation and the `Diameter()`.  Removing it would mean that for `Center()` we would have to calculate the mean of all subrectangle centers, and it would be harder to cache something for `Diameter()`.  My idea in removing it was to make `sizeof(CellBound)` smaller but it seems that's not really feasible.  But I thought it would be useful to write down the notes anyway in case it was ever revisited later. :)"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/746/files/f17843fc8e8ef2b1c4b04d572c521575f20a1f3c#r76306894"}}}</script>